Hey Ouut!! Can I play devil's advocate here for just a sec? I know it ain't the right forum for this type of debate, but I just have to ask the question...let's take your example of momma spankin' junior inside a car at my indoor drive-in...are you suggesting that in allowing momma and junior into my theater, I've aided and/or abetted in a crime? I mean, maybe your exaggerating just a bit to make your point, but I don't believe any of the venues where individuals who have been publicly identified as child abusers for hitting their children in public have been slapped with any kind of a litigation simply because it is where the abuser chose to act. I don't recall any news on lawsuits against the hundreds of stores where such acts do occur on a daily basis. Of course, that's not to say they don't exist, but I'll have to find a lawyer who can back this statement up.
This goes for all other types of crimes as well. As I mentioned before, my husband is a cop and with no offense to any of you, stated that there is a guideline that is followed when making a criminal drug bust. He is not saying that it is impossible that something like the DEA taking advantage of crime for personal gain doesn't exist, but he does say that it is unlikely that it is as easy as identifying a juicy find like an indoor theater and confiscating it based on false accusations of drug selling. Besides, if this were the case, there are many bars, restaurants (and I mean nice ones), and hotels that the DEA can take over in a heartbeat simply for drug selling.
Once again, I truly appreciate any and all of your feedback because it will keep me on my toes. However, I have to mention that in most states, there is what is known as a common sense clause. All legal professionals are familiar with this clause, and so are most public safety employees. There has to be some fine line where the obvious becomes ridiculous and I feel the need to just mention this. I realize the potential for a variety of risks, but I don't believe that they only apply to my idea. I'm of the opinion that if no one has been impacted thus far by any suggestions of the above crimes, that even though it could happen in the future, I can be comfortable that my venue will retain just as much risk as the next business owner. This includes all movie theaters, drive-ins, and any other public venue. To think that such crimes would only exist due to a venue such as mine is kind of ludicrous and although I truly appreciate you having brought it up, I think I get the point. But once again, if these crimes can happen in my type of venue, then they would have already happened in the venues of the present day. And unless someone can confirm for me whether any type of crime mentioned in previous replies have occurred in any of the theater venues, I thank you for your input and beg you to come up with other thoughts.
Out, I do appreciate your input and thank you for your encouragement. Please don't take this the wrong way, but I do get it, and I will cma (cover my a--).