That's a very deceptive number. It includes thousands of auditoriums equipped with non-theatrical projectors that are only suitable for pre-show presentations. These projectors are not suitable for first run motion pictures. Their resolution is too low, their lamps are not bright enough and their contrast ratio is too low.
That's interesting, but I wonder how accurate your statement is. According to the
March 9 Wall Street Journal, Carmike accounts for 2,147 digital screens... almost half of the 5,000 screens that Christie is taking credit for. Christie gained a huge PR coup over the buy, and many have wondered how much they might have sweetened the deal for an exhibitor, fresh out of bankruptcy.
Of the digital installs that are left, I would seriously doubt you could make a case that 'thousands' have the characteristics you describe. Of the lists I've seen published, it seems to me that there very well could be 2,800 other qualified theatrical installations, spread out over the country.
IMHO, the biggest problem with the whole digital push is that
NOBODY knows what they're talking about, yet everyone seems to have some date in their head when we'll either have to be digital or close our doors. It started when George Lucas arrogantly decreed we'd have to be digital or not get his next Star Wars release. Since then, others have suggested they'd release in digital only, only to find that their fractional share of the 5,000 total screens wouldn't quite qualify as a "wide release".
Nobody knows when, or if digital will become the only available way to go. Nobody knows if it'll be 2k, 4k, a combination, or if another process will be introduced, further diluting the available market.
Nobody knows if digital will coexist with film and if so, for how long.
Nobody knows if 3D can survive the recurring fees that are imposed on the technology by the manufacturers (TI is also lining up at the 3D trough).
Nobody knows how low the cost of digital will go, if financing will be available to everyone, who will pay for it, whether you will qualify or have to self-finance, and when or if any of this will happen before we're all too old to care.
For certain, we're all inundated with the opinions of the studios,
manufacturers and integrators, and unfortunately, more than a few of us are all too happy to buy into their wishful thinking.
Years after we were first 'notified' of film's impending demise, we continue to stress out over the potential enevitabilities we've conjured up in our heads, and worry about whether the digital steamroller will catch up to us this year... or maybe next year... or maybe.... .
I'm all for watching the process. I have no difficulty with digital's cheerleaders. But please... if you're going to toss out numbers, dates and times, doom and gloom, basing it on verifiable fact would be MUCH appreciated over wild speculation, of which there's an abundance right now.