I think what KingJoe is referring to is called an Evaporator; these things work by evaporating water through fan-forced air, but depend upon relatively dry air to work, as in desert areas. In areas of high humidity, they do not work well, and even add to the humidity level.
I can sympathize with you in that heat, Mike. In a theatre where a friend of mine was projectionist over two carbon arcs, the booth got to well over 100 in the summer with the windows of the booth open. He took to wearing nothing but his briefs and shoes, and still sweated like a pig! (the management of the independent subrun wouldn't do anything about the heat, even if they could afford it).
There ARE things that you could do, of course, but they are NOT cheap as you probably imagine. There are three problems:
1) General ambient for the sake of the humans up there. This would require true air conditioning (cooling) by means of a remote, two-part system as Outaframe recommends. These are common in commercial applications and all central home systems are an adaptation of this arrangement with a set of fan-forced coils inside, connected by means of tubing to another set of fan-forced coils and compressor outdoors or on the roof. Trying to use the cooled air from the auditorium poses problems: code often does not allow this, especially if the fire wall must be pierced; the cooling load of the booth would have to be added to the total that the auditorium system is designed to withstand; one would have to provide an air path into and out of the booth (supply and return) to the auditorium, and this would allow more noise from the booth to enter the auditorium(s) -- NOT desireable. The effectiveness of any such a "borrowing" arrangement is not going to be good unless it involves high velocity/volume fans/blowers which require LARGE ducts (3-foot or more in diameter!)
2) The exhaust air for the projectors. This would normally mean that the exhaust fans would draw the cooled air out of the booth, but you could prevent this by putting a supply duct (from the outdoors) opening right under the projector so that the air stream would be right up and over the projector to its exhaust hood. True, some cooled air will still excape through this, but the only alternative is to create a 'jacket' around the projector to contain the air supplied from outdoors up to the exhaust hood/duct. One's local codes might impact this arrangement.
3) The amps. If they fail due to heat, it could be very costly and most inconvenient in the middle of a feature on a hot, humid night when many of your audience are there to cool off. In this case it might be possible to adapt one of those non-compressor coolers (thermionic cooling) sold at Target and camping goods suppliers. If you are handy, it might be possible to buy a large enough one (or build an insulation board enclosure and insert the guts of the cooler into its wall) and thus create a micro-climate for the amplifier, sort of like its own personal refrigerator. This won't do a thing to help the poor guy up there, but at least the amps won't get fried. It will take some trial and error by seeing just how much heat such a unit will remove verses how much heat the amps can create. Put a thermometer inside such an enclosure and take periodic readings of the enclosed temperature. Such units are not designed for long term operation, versus expensive laboratory units which are, but you might experiment for less than $200 in materials. Then again, one of those little mini-refrigerators (usually compressor types) sold for dorm room or apartment use might be simpler and cheaper, if not a little noiseier. You would have to cut a hole through its wall for the cables/wires, but if you are careful, you should not encounter any problems. You would have to check if any defrosting cycles would do too much thermal stress to the amplifiers, however. Resign yourself to the fact that any warranty would be shot for any use of this type. It would also be wise to put a high-temperature alarm inside the unit in case it should fail, in which case it would soon become a 'hot box!'
I wish there were an easy, cheap way to answer these problems, but there isn't. Creating coolness has always been far more expensive than creating heat. Best Wishes. Jim
[This message has been edited by jimor (edited October 06, 2003).]