One thing's for sure, they did go ultra-wide on this one, do you think that was for ego's sake? Nobody seems to have had any problem getting it, or moving screens etc.
Ego? Nope... Greed (my opinion).
As you know, the studios get the highest percentages on the first weeks, though I guess we're really talking about one person here. Get the most prints out so everyone can see the show without having to walk more than 10 feet, then take most of the boxoffice. From everyone's perspective but the exhibitor's, it's the best time to make the most money.
Unfortunately, that also means that there are many more choices for the customer pool to select from. You've fractured the available customer base during the very time that the percentages are highest, AND forced the prints to stay in those theatres by contract. The film burns out faster, and takes longer to slide into sub-run. The first-run houses hurt because now they've got a print taking up screen space and they can't get rid of it. The subs hurt because it'll take 6 weeks for the film to move to their level. Everyone hurts because the percentages are dropping half as fast as normal pictures...
So, unless I've missed something here, it seems like this movie was a huge loss-leader that can only work for multiplexes. "Shark Boy and Lava Girl" would probably leave us with more money to deposit than SW3, even though the numbers coming in the door will likely be far less.
It's really fascinating, watching how people got so wound up over the first weeks grosses on this film, seeing as how the theatres didn't get to keep much of it. It was also interesting to see how many single-screen exhibitors were tripping over themselves, trying to get the film.
Yes, I could have had it. No, I didn't book it. No, I'm not bitter... but I'm also not very impressed with how this has worked for our part of the chain, either.
[This message has been edited by rodeojack (edited June 05, 2005).]