Banner
Home Forums Movie Theaters The Lobby Higher Cost Of Movie Making
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Forgot your password? Forgot your username? Create an account
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Higher Cost Of Movie Making

Higher Cost Of Movie Making 31 Jul 2001 09:56 #1907

  • poppajoe
  • poppajoe's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 455
The topic has been around for a long time. Many movies being made abroad for less then they could be produced for here in the U.S. I was thinking that what if the producers were to shoot movies in states like Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire in the north. Then shoot in the southern states like the Virginas, Tenn.,and Arkansas; the states that really need revenue. It seems to me that they could cut cost somewhat. I'm not really sure what goes on when a location is chosen, but it was the thought that entered my head when I read the article.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Higher Cost Of Movie Making 31 Jul 2001 23:04 #1908

  • Ken Layton
  • Ken Layton's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 878
  • Thank you received: 7
No matter what state you shoot a movie in, the cost of the union crew is still the same (WAY TOO MUCH!). That's why some movies are filmed abroad---lower labor costs, easier or no permits, etc.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Higher Cost Of Movie Making 02 Aug 2001 17:11 #1909

  • Mike
  • Mike's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5326
  • Thank you received: 74
And don't foget Oh Canada! Our northern friends are very filming friendly.
Mike Hurley
www.bigscreenbiz.com
Michael Hurley
Impresario
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.235 seconds
attraction attraction
attraction
attraction
attraction
attraction