I thought I would finally give an update on this situation for any who might be interested. I just didn't have the heart for it until now.
I went and looked at this theater a few weeks ago. After looking for myself, I decided that I would be in over my head to take on such a project. I would not have been satisfied to just keep the property a twin. I wanted a 3 screen.
What I originally guessed was correct. The theater was built as a large single screen, probably seating 800 to 1000 people. Later it was twinned, using only the rear half of the old theater. The front part (or is it the rear?) with small stage and original screen area remains essentially unused except as a very large, disorganized storage area full of junk. I'm not sure about the roof in there either. There were lots of spots on the ceiling.
I didn't like the look of how the place was twinned. To add a third screen in the unused space would take a lot of effort. It would end up with a separate booth and new hallways (which would narrow the existing 2 auditoriums). They currently seat about 210 and 225 and are nearly the same size, and one of them has an old crying room not in service. The emergency exit routes pass through the old unused screen area, so hallways would have to be built down the sides of that area too. That might be ok since that room is probably nearly square, and might need to be narrowed. It might even be possible to put two screens in that old space and make it a 4 screen, but of course everything costs plenty of money.
When I crunched all the numbers before going to see it, I only allowed about $25,000 for additional refurbishment of the theater. (It was advertised as if that old auditorium just needed seats, or at least that was my interpretation.) I decided that figure would be much higher and I wasn't comfortable with where it was going. They were asking $250,000 as it was. After calculating the market potential for the area. Even at the purchase price plus a 25k additional refurbishment, I felt that I needed to pull at least a 60% share of the market to make it worthwhile. Since many people in the town are in the habit of traveling to the bigger city 50 miles away for their outings, and since it only has a few screens, I didn't feel comfortable assuming any more market share to cover greater expense. I try to be conservative with numbers.
I also had determined that for this theater to be workable, it had to improve the film selection and likely it would have to go day and date. Several people mentioned that was one reason they thought it didn't do well. Most major films didn't play there until 3 or 4 weeks out, if they played there at all, and people just went to the city to see them and didn't wait. This means that the costs of running the theater could not be minimized to make it work. I think that is what happened to the last owner. His plan must have been to run the theater at as low a cost as possible, assuming that his customers would wait to watch films in their hometown. Seems like that didn't work in this town. I know it does work in other places, but probably not there.
As for the rest of the facility, it is fine. Some parts, such as the lobby and concession area, are very nice. The existing auditoriums are ok. The seats were all replaced about a year ago, although they don't have cup holders. They are nothing fancy, but probably are fine for the 1950's experience that the owner seemed to be going for.
The equipment in the booth seemed ok too, based on my limited knowledge. Equipment there included Century projectors, Strong Lumex lamphouses, a Christie platter, automation, and what appeared to be digital sound equipment, along with other stuff I won't name.
The loft apartment was above the lobby and had windows overlooking the marquee with a view of the town square. It was very industrial and not to our tastes. It would have needed more work to make it a place I'd want to raise my kids in. However, I could see other people thinking it's kind of cool. They had knocked a hole in the wall of the apartment to give access to the booth. Convenient for a dedicated owner, I suppose. The restrooms looked much like smaller versions of the ones down in the theater, so the layout was odd and the fixtures out of place for an apartment (unless you like a full length urinal in your apartment and shower water draining through the floor drain in the middle of the room). Like I said, very industrial and not for everyone.
I guess what I'm saying here is that if anyone else is interested in a twin in a town with 12,000 people and about 2000 more in the trade area, I know where you can find one for the advertised price of $250,000. If you want future potential to add 1 or 2 more screens, it might be there too. I'm not sure if the numbers work very well, but I'll leave that to someone else, because I'm no longer interested. The theater has a website at
www.vernonplaza.com where you can find out more about it. Please direct your questions to the realtor listed there. I'm not trying to sell it, she is.
I think this was the last time I'll be looking into theater ownership, at least for a long time. I wish you all well. I think I'll take Roxy's advice posted not long ago and stay out of this industry which is undergoing such tremendous pains in a time of uncertainty. However, good luck to all of you that continue to seek to make all our lives a little brighter by casting the magic light on the big screen.